HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
WINGS LIFESTYLE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 29749/2024
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:61590
APHC010566852024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 29749/2024
Between:
1. W INGS LIFESTYLE, M.G. ROAD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, PANKAJ NAHATA, S/O NAGRAJ NAHATA, AGED
ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 304, UMRAO KAMAL RAJ APARTMENT,
SARDAR PATEL MARG, JAIPUR- 302001.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LEGAL
METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
2. T HE INSPECTOR, LEGAL METROLOGY, WEIGHTS AND
MEASUREMENTS DEPARTMENT, CIRCLE-1, VIJAYAWADA, NTR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the Notice bearing No.
PC/219/160/2024-25 /01 dated 24.11.2024 issued by the Respondent No.2
as manifestly arbitrary, per se illegal, capricious, whimsical, per se illegal, pre-
determined, contrary and opposed to the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and
Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 besides being dehors
jurisdiction and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 14, 19
##PAGE2##2
2025V:SA,JP HC:61590
W.P.No.29749 of 2024
and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set-aside the same
and/or pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to vacate the interim order dated 18.12.2024 in W.P.No.29749 of
2024 and dismiss the Writ Petition
IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to hear the WP NO 29749 of 2024 under the caption "For
Being Mentioned" to modift the interim order in WP NO 29749 of 2024 Dated
18.12.2024 as 3Months for Furnishing bank guarantees instead of 6months in
favor of Respondent No.1 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2025V:SA,JP HC:61590
W.P.No.29749 of 2024
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“….to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ
of Mandamus to declare the Notice bearing No. PC/219/160/2024-25 /01
dated 24.11.2024 issued by the Respondent No.2 as manifestly arbitrary,
per se illegal, capricious, whimsical, per se illegal, pre-determined,
contrary and opposed to the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and Legal
Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 besides being dehors
jurisdiction and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 14, 19
and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set-aside the
same and/or pass….”
2. The petitioner herein is a company registered under the provisions of
the Companies Act, 2013 and is being represented by its Managing Director.
The petitioner company is a manufacturer and dealer of clothes across India.
As a part of its business, the premises admeasuring 800 square feet in
D.No.40-1-53, Revenue ward No.10, block 3, Benz circle, Vijayawada, NTRD
district was leased out and after obtaining necessary trade license and
permissions, the petitioner has been continuing its business by running a retail
cloth store.
3. While the matter stood thus, on 24.11.2024, the 2nd respondent visited
the petitioner’s clothing store and found that the size of the commodities were
not declared in metric units as required under Rule 6
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.