HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Nanepalli Chiranjeevi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 35489/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:APHC:61841
APHC010692412025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3332]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 35489/2025
Between:
1. NANEPALLI CHIRANJEEVI,, S/O. N. APPLANAIDU, AGED ABOUT 51
YEARS, R/O. D.NO.57, KAPU STREET, KONDAKERLA,
ATCHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH - 531033.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH - 522238.
2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH -531033.
3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
ATCHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH -531033.
4. THE KONDAKERLA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY, ATCHUTHAPURAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531033.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature
##PAGE2##2
2025:APHC:61841
of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 4th respondent in not receiving
application made for building permission and in issuing eviction notice
through Proceedings Rc.No. 2 of 2025 dated 22.11.2025, directing me to stop
the work and removal of minor construction in the D.No.16-6, in an extent of
65 Sq.yards in Sy.No.96/A of Kondakeria. Atchuthapuram Mandal, Anakapalli
District, even though the construction is made on private land and not
creating any hindrance to the public or vehicles and only due to political
reasons, for being illegal, arbitrary, motivated by political rivalry, violative of
provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, devoid of
principles of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently direct the
4th respondent to not interfere with my house property in D.No.16-6, in an
extent of 65 Sq.yards in Sy.No.96/A of Kondakeria. Atchuthapuram Mandal,
Anakapalli District, by setting aside the 4th respondent notice dated
22.11.2025, and pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the 4th respondent to receive and consider my application for building
permission, by suspending eviction notice proceedings RC No. 2/2025, dated
22.11.2025,Pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
##PAGE3##3
2025:APHC:61841
The Court made the following order:
The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4 is not receiving
the application made for building permission and has issued eviction notice
through proceedings vide Rc.No.2 of 2025 dated 22.11.2025 directing the
petitioner to stop the construction work and remove the minor construction in
D.No.16-6 in an extent of 65 sq yards in survey No.96/A of Kondakerla,
Achuthapuram Mandal, Anakapalli District.
2. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Pemmasani, learned counsel for the petitioner,
Smt D.Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj
Department and Sri Y.Koteswararao, learned standing counsel for Gram
Panchayat.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in elaboration to what has been
stated in the affidavit, contended that the petitioner is the lawful owner and
possessor of the subject Gramakantam land, which was purchased by his
mother in the year 1986 under a registered sale deed. Since then, the
petitioner and his family have been in continuous possession and enjoyment
of the subject premises by constructing a residential house. Due to the
dilapidated condition of the old house, the petitioner decided to construct a
new house in the same premises without any diversions or deviation, after
obtaining a build
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.