SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18385

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
E SHILPA – Appellant
Versus
DR PULLIMADDI NAGA SESHULU – Respondent


APHC010275642024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1448/2024 Between:

1. E SHILPA, , W/O. UPENDRA, D/O. NUTHANPATI PEDDA VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS.

2. N . RAVINDRA,, S/O. NUTHANPATI PEDDA VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF BRAHMANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL.NANDYAL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. D R PULLIMADDI NAGA SESHULU, S/O. LATE P. NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. PRIVATE PRACTITIONER, R/O, H.NO. 20-78-2, GANDHI NAGAR, VELUGODU POST AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

2. N UTHANAPATI PEDDA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. BUSI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

3. N UTHANAPATI GANGADHAR, S/O, N. PEDDA VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF BRAHMANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL,NANDYAL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toggrieved by the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur passed in I.A.No.24 of 2023 m O.S.No,13 of 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top