1. Writ petition — Petitioners repeatedly absent — Matter listed for dismissal — Dismissed for non-prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 )
Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
VEERULLAPADU MANDALA PORATA COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WP 4141/2023
1. Writ petition — Petitioners repeatedly absent — Matter listed for dismissal — Dismissed for non-prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 )
2. Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution — No order as to costs — Miscellaneous applications closed. (Para 3 )
Yes, if the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case despite being listed for dismissal, the court may dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 )
ORDER:
On 06.11.2025 and 04.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top