SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18841

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
P.VENKATA RAO & 44 – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP PRL.SCY M.A.D HYD & 4 – Respondent


ORDER:

The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the notices bearing No.123-T, dated 27-3-2015 to the writ petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Provisions of The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioners from our shops situated on the bank of Rivas canal, Lenin Center, NTS No.1015 of Vijayawada City,….”

2. The petitioners herein are vendors of fancy and readymade cloths who erected their shops on the embankment of Rivas Canal, NTS No.1015, belonging to the Irrigation Department, by obtaining electricity connections from the concerned department, and they are also paying taxes to the Municipal Corporation.

3. While things stood thus, the 5th respondent herein issued a notice dated 27.03.2015 bearing Notice No.123-T to the petitioners directing them to vacate the premises occupied by them, failing which action would be taken against them. Challenging

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top