SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 19986

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
T SUMANA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 19536/2025



APHC010383662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3327]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 19536/2025 Between:

1. T SUMANA, W/O SAI MANOHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PERMANENTLY, R/O, PANDLURU VILLAGE, OZILI POST, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TEMPORALLY RESIDING AT 71,LANES, 4TH CROSS, NAVODAYA NAGAR, J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE SOUTH, KARNATAKA STATE - 560078.

2. T. VABHAVI AKSHITHA REDDY,, D/O T. SAI MANOHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS PERMANENTLY, R/O, PANDLURU VILLAGE, OZILI POST, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TEMPORALLY RESIDING AT 77,6TH LANES, 4TH CROSS, NAVODAYA NAGAR, J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE SOUTH, KARNATAKA STATE - 560078.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI.

SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT FISHERIES OFFICER, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, GUDUR, TIRUPATHI

5. THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR OF FISHERIES, CHITTAMURU, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SECTION NO.4, CHITTAMURU, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

7. DEVULLA GEETHA, W/O SOMASEKHAR REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O ESWARAWAKA VILLAGE, CHITTAMURU MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not disposing of license Application Bearing No. AQNLFW00078609 dated 23-11-2023 under the Andhra Pradesh State Aquaculture Development Authority Act submitted by the petitioner For New Freshwater Aquaculture which falls out Side Aquaculture Zone as contrary to law, illegal and arbitrary violative of provisions of Registration Act 1908 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner aqua culture admeasuring Ac. 4.92 Cents comprised in Survey No. 350-2A2, 360-1A1, 362-1B situated at Eswaravaka Village, Chittamuru Mandal, Tirupathi District, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner aqua culture admeasuring Ac. 4.92 Cents comprised in Survey No. 350-2A2, 360-1A1, 362-1B situated at Eswaravaka Village, Chittamuru Mandal, Tirupathi District and to dispose of the license Application Bearing No. AQNLFW00078609 dated 23-11-2023 under the Andhra Pradesh State Aquaculture Development Authority Act submitted by the petitioner For New Freshwater Aquaculture which falls out Side Aquaculture Zone pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. B P RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19536 of 2025

ORDER:

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of respondents in not disposing of license application bearing No.AQNLFW00078609 dated 23.11.2023 under the Andhra Pradesh State Aquaculture Development Authority Act submitted by the petitioners for new Freshwater Aquaculture which falls outside aquaculture zone as illegal and arbitrary.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the cause does not survive in the present Writ Petition as permanent licence has already been granted in favour of petitioners. In view of the said submission,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top