APHC010304282022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3233]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 18051/2022 Between:

1. V VENKATA LAKSHMI, , W/O. V. SHANKAR SHASTRI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NEAR R.G. ROAD, HANCHINAL CAMP (SHANTINAGAR), HANCHINHAL (K), RAICHUR, KARNATAKA STATE.

...PETITIONER AND

1. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SANKAVARAM VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT-ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB. COLLECTOR OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT -531118.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, S. RAYAVARAM, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT- 531060, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

5. T HE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION (NAOB) YELAMANCHILI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT 531055, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents - authorities in including the petition scheduled land Ac. 5.00 situated in Sy.No. 422/2 of Vakapadu village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Erstwhile Visakhapatnam District, presently Anakapalli district under Section 22 (A) (1) (a) of Registration Act list published by the 3rd respondent inspite of the fact that the petitioner father Sri. Pullela Satyanarayana Murthy obtained D- form Patta under Ex-serviceman quota and not paying the, compensation to the petitioner under L.A. Act though the petition scheduled land has been acquired/taken over by the 5th respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violation of Article 14, 19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also judgment rendered by the Hon'ble High Court reported in 2004 (2) ALD 451 (LB) and consequently direct the respondent authorities to pay the compensation in terms of L.A. Act to the petitioner for the land acquired to an extent of Ac. 5.00 situated in Sy.No. 422/2 of Vakapadu village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Erstwhile Visakhapatnam District, presently Anakapalli district by the 5th respondent as the petitioner father is absolute owner and peaceful possession of the petition scheduled land by virtue of the patta granted to her father under Ex-serviceman quota and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pay the compensation to the petitioner under L.A. Act for the land taken over/ acquired to an xtent of Ac. 5.00 situated in Sy.No. 422/2 of Vakapadu village, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Erstwhile Visakhapatnam District, press Anakapalli district by the 5th respondent forthwith (as the petiti is only legal heir of Sri. Pullela Satyanarayana Murthy), pen disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioners herein to file the reply to the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in WP No. 18051 of 2022 in the interest of Justice or otherwise the petitioner will be put irreparable loss and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioners herein to file the in WP No. 18051 ofreply to the counter affidavit filed by the respondents 2022 in the interest of Justice or otherwise the petitioner will be