HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN
Bollu Prabhakara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 10263/2021
APHC010168972021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3233]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10263/2021 Between:
1. B OLLU PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O B. APPARAO, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O HNO. 18-6-12, VOKKALANKA STREET, VIZIANAGARAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI.
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , VIZIANAGARAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
4. TAHSILDAR, PUSAPATIREGA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
5. GALLA VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O SUGUNASEELARAO, AGED 72 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO. 124, SECTOR-IV, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
6. GARLANKI SUJATHA, W/O TRINADHARAO, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O HNO. 17-2-29, AG ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
7. TIRUMALAREDDY SUNITHA, W/O VENKATA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O HNO. 17-2-29, AG ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
8. BOYA SUDHARANI, W/O SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O HNO. 17-2-29, AG ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
9. RAYAPUREDDY BHAGYALAKSHMI, W/O BHASKAR, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O HNO. 17-2-29, AG ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
10. B ANDI PRIYANKA, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O HNO. 17-2-29, AG ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
11. N ARELLA AMARANATH, S/O RAMAKRISHNA , AGED ABOUT
52 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 18-3-31, GUNDALAVARI STREET, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. R11 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.12.07.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO. 01 OF 2022.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in mutating the names of the respondent Nos. 6 to 10 for the property in Survey No. 428-1 admeasuring Ac. 2.42 cents of Kumili Revenue Village, Pusapatirega Mandal, Vizianagaram District without serving any notice on the petitioner, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently suspend the mutation entries in the names of the respondent Nos. 6 to 10 and direct the respondent No. 4 to maintain status quo ante and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the mutation entries in the names of the respondent Nos: 6 to 10 and direct the respondent No: 4 to maintain status quo ante in Survey No: 428-1 admeasuring Ac. 2.42 cents of Kumili Revenue Village, Pusapatirega Mandal, Vizianagaram District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead him, as party respondents No. 11 in W.P. No. 10263 of 2021 as well as in I.A., on the file of this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order granted in I.A. No.1 of 2021 in W.P. No. 10263 of 2021, dated 14.06.2021 and pass such other IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 14.06.2021 in WP.No.10263 of 2021 and to dismiss the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A A SWAMY
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO 4. SARIPALLI SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the followi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.