SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20480

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
D RAMESH
Meka Madhusudhana Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 33842/2025



2025:APHC:56614 APHC010650812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 33842/2025 Between:

1. M EKA MADHUSUDHANA RAO,, S/O.LATE VIJAYA BHASKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.KOSURU VILLAGE, MOWA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM.

3. T HE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM.

4. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VUYYURU REVENUE DIVISION, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

5. T HE TAHSILDAR, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

6. T ATINENI VENKATA SUBBA RAO, , S/O. TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT

69 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.2-10, SRINAGAR COLONY, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

7. T ATINENI YOGANAMD, S/O.TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC- RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O.PLOT NOS.40 AND 41, JYOTHI LOTUS APARTMENT, HUDA HEIGHTS, NEAR LOTUS POND, ROAD NO. 12, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not disposing my appeal filed under section 5(4) of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 dated 22.07.2024 against the revenue entries made on the name of respondents 6 and 7 in respect of land for an extent of Ac. 1.05 cents, Ac.0.35 cents, Ac.0.16 cents, Ac. 1.05 cents and Ac.0.16 cents in respectively covered by Survey Numbers 370/3, 1008- 4B of Kapileswarapuram Revenue Village in Pamidimukkala Mandal of Krishna District by the 5th respondent, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to dispose of my appeal filed on 22.07.2024 to conduct an enquiry by issuing notices and pass appropriate orders In accordance with Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent to decide and dispose of my appeal filed on 22.07.2024 to conduct an enquiry by issuing notices and pass appropriate orders in accordance with Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Emd pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BATTULA SANJAIAH GANDHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.33842 OF 2025

ORDER

1. The present writ petition is filed for the following relief:

“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in not disposing my appeal filed under section 5(4) of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 dated 22.07.2024 against the revenue entries made on the name of respondents 6 and 7 in respect of land for an extent of Ac. 1.05 cents, Ac.0.35 cents, Ac.0.16 cents, Ac. 1.05 cents and Ac.0.16 cents in respectively covered by Survey Numbers 370/3, 1008-4B of Kapileswarapuram Revenue Village in Pamidimukkala Mandal of Krishna District by the 5th respondent, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to dispose of my appeal filed on 22.07.2024 to conduct an enquir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top