SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20529

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
Dr S. Sri Rama Rajiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 34013/2025



APHC010659232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333]

AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 34013/2025 Between:

1. D R S. SRI RAMA RAJIV KUMAR,, S/O S KUMAR RAJA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC MEDICAL OFFICER, E- UPHC VISAKHAPATNAM,R/O H. NO 6-287/1, PETROL BUNK BACK SIDE,ANNAVARAM VILLAGE, SANKHAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,)

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT (YL CIRCLE), DOWLESWARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

3. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT (YL CIRCLE), PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

4. T HE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT

5. T HE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, SRI SATYANARAYANA SAGAR, A. ANNAVARAM VILLAGE, SANKHAVARAM MANDAL, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT

6. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT

7. T HE TAHSILDAR, SANKHAVARAMMANDAL, A ANNAVARAM KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

8. T HE ANNAVARAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY SANKAVARAM MANDAL, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the high handed action of respondents more particularly Respondents No. 2 to 5 in proposing to demolish the subject property of the petitioner herein admeasuring of an extent of Ac. 0.08 cents of land situated at A, Annavaram Village, Sankavarama Mandal, Kakinada, in Sy NO. 74/2A1 bearing D. No. 6-287/1 with Revised Door No. 6-322, on the ground that the petitioner encroached PWD CheruvuPoromboke in survey No.74/2A1of an to an extent of Ac.0.08 cents, pursuant to the impugned notice dated 14.11.2025 v/deLetter. No. A.E.E/S SSagar Section. Annavaram/ 60 A, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 21, 19 and 300 -A of the Constitution of India,and consequently set aside the impugned notice dated14.11.2025 wdeLetter. No. A.E.E/S SSagar Section. Annavaram/ 60 A, and direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of subject property of the petitioner herein of an extent of Ac. 0.08 cents of land situated at A, Annavaram Village, Sankavarama Mandal, Kakinada, in Sy NO. 74/2A1 bearing D. No. 6-287/1 with Revised Door No. 6-322, and further grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice dated 14.11.2025 v/deLetter. No. A.E.E/S SSagar Section. Annavaram/ 60 A, in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents not to demolish the subject property of the petitioner herein admeasuring of an extent of Ac. 0.08 cents of land situated at A, Annavaram Village, Sankavarama Mandal, Kakinada, in Sy NO. 74/2A1 bearing D. No. 6-287/1 with Revised Door No. 6-

322, in the interest of justice, IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice dated: 14.11.2025 vide Letter. No. A.E.E/S S Nagar Section. Annavaram/ 60 A, of an extent of Ac. 0.08 cents of land situated at A, Annavaram Village, Sankavarama Mandal, Kakinada, in Sy NO. 74/2A1 bearing D. No. 6-287/1 with Revised Door No. 6-

322, in the interest of justice, Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M SRI ATCHYUT Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top