APHC010476812024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24520/2024 Between:

1. I SARAPU PERUMAL RAO, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 76 YEARS, R/O.

D. NO. 50-7-27, GOLLAVEEDHI, SEETHAMPETA, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. V ISAKHAPATNAM METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VMRDA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, (FORMERLY VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY), REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

3. T HE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER), VISAKHAPATNAM METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (VMRDA), (FORMERLY VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY), VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. T HE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, (FORMERLY VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION), VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent 2 to 4 herein in not considering the representation of the petitioner under receipt dated 24.03.2022 for payment of compensation for the acquired land in an extent of 871 square yards in Survey Number 40 and 40 and 40/1B of Gandhi Nagar, Resapuvaripalem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh as well as in not obeying the orders passed in WP No. 20409 of 2008 for consideration of the case of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India as well as oppose to all cannons of justice and also contemptuous in nature consequentially direct the respondents more particularly respondents 2 to 4 herein to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of compensation by duly considering the representation dated 24.03.2022 as well as the orders passed in WP No. 20409 of 2008 dated 18.09.2008 forthwith as per Act 30 of 2013 The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act further, direct the 1st respondent to take stringent action against the respondents 2 to 4 herein for disobedience of the orders of this Honorable Court in WP No. 20409 of 2008 dated 18.09.2008 as well as in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 24.03.2022 in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the respondents more particularly respondents 2 to 4 herein to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of compensation by duly considering the representation dated 24.03.2022 as well as the orders passed in WP No. 20409 of 2008 dated 18.09.2008 forthwith as per Act 30 of 2013 The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the 1 st respondent to take stringent action against the respondents 2 to 4 herein for disobedience of the orders of this Honorable Court in WP No. 20409 of 2008 dated 18.09.2008 as well as in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 24.03.2022 in the