2025:APHC:52786 APHC010566682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29761/2025 Between:

1. G ANISETTI NAGAMANI, W/O. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O 10-2-2, JANGALAPALEM, TUTIPALA PANCHAYAT, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUHTUR DISTRICT, A.P.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI, A.P

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, A.P.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, MAKAVARAPALEM, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, A.P.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my Mee Seva online Application No. ANPL 2025031064, dt. 10- 03-2025, 23-09- 2024 Revenue (CCLA) Record of Rights (ROR) correction of entries in revenue Records, consequential grant of Pattadar Pass book under Record of Rights Act ,1971 is bad, illegal and arbitrary and to consider the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider my online application No.ANPL2025031064, dt. 10-03-2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order:

The writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:-

“…to issue a Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my Mee Seva online Application No. ANPL 2025031064, dt. 10-03-2025, 23-09-2024 Revenue (CCLA) Record of Rights (ROR) correction of entries in revenue Records, consequential grant of Pattadar Pass book under Record of Rights Act ,1971 is bad, illegal and arbitrary and to consider the same and to pass…”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made applications dated 10.03.2025 and 23.09.2024 to the respondent authorities under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, seeking mutation of her name in the revenue records and for issuance of e-pattadar passbooks in favour of the petitioner in respect of the subject land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Survey No.305-2A in Tutipala Revenue, Makavarapalem Mandal, Ankapalli District and further that the petitioner also made an application under Form-6A. It is contended that, despite the same, the respondents have not considered and passed orders till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.

4. Despite granting sufficient time, the learned Government Pleader is not able to get any instructions from the authorities.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the respondents, more particularly respondent No.4 to consider the applications made by the petitioner and take appropriate action as per rules, within a period of two (02) months, from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE D RA