HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,K MANMADHA RAO
PALLA CHENCHU HARIKALA – Appellant
Versus
BYSANI SATISH – Respondent
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
Heard Sri M. R. K. Chakravarthy, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and Sri C. Subodh, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. The review petitioner is the appellant in A.S.No.59 of 2020.
3. The appeal was filed challenging the Order and Decree dated
09.12.2019 in E.A.No.32 of 2017 in E.P.No.50 of 2013 in O.S.No.98 of 2010, passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore. The E.A.No.32 of 2017 filed by the appellant under Order 21 Rule 58 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) was rejected by the Executing Court.
4. The appeal A.S.No.59 of 2020 was dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 05.01.2022, against which the aforesaid review application has been filed.
I. Facts:
5. O.S.No.98 of 2010 was filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 4 against one Pallala Bujjamma and respondents 5 and 6 for realization of the suit amount by redemption of mortgage. Preliminary decree dated 13.11.2011 was passed and the final decree was passed on 05.08.2013. The defendant/judgment debtors failed to comply with the decree, so the plaintiffs/respondents 1 to 4/decree holders filed E.P.No.50
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.