SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22431

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
T Sireesha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 31924/2025



APHC010615202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31924/2025 Between:

1. T SIREESHA, W/O.L V K S SUBRAHMANYAM AGED 37 YEARS OCC.

PVT. EMPLOYEE R/O.103 SAI BALAJI APARTMENT SANTHI NAGAR BATWADIPALEM NELLORE ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE DEPARTMENT AP POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT

4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 4TH TOWN POLICE STATION, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent police in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of her premises and in directing removal of the CCTV cameras lawfully installed by the petitioner for her personal and family security, as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent police not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners peaceful possession and with the CCTV cameras installed within her premises, except in accordance with law and further direct the respondent police to provide necessary protection to the petitioner and her family members from the acts of harassment, intimidation, and threats made by fellow apartment associates by taking consideration of the complaint dated 03.11.2025 and pass

1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR

1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:

ORDER

This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:

“ ... to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent police in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of her premises and in directing removal of the CCTV cameras lawfully installed by the petitioner for her personal and family security, as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent police not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners peaceful possession and with the CCTV cameras installed within her premises, except in accordance with law and further direct the respondent police to provide necessary protection to the petitioner and her family members from the acts of harassment, intimidation, and threats made by fellow apartment associates by taking consideration of the complaint dated 03.11.2025 and pass ...”

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that respondent Police are not calling the Petitioner for the purpose of investigation with regard to Crime No.200 of 2025 which is registered against the husband of the Petitioner and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.

In that view, Police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the subject crime registered against the Petitioner’s husband for securing his presence for the purpose of investigation.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Writ Petition No. 31924 of 2025

27.11.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top