Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Dr.P.Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
Rayalaseema University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed under article 226 for relief against arbitrary practices in contract employment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents assert the petitioner's temporary status and proper compliance with appointment norms. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. core issue on the substitution of contract employees examined; emphasis on maintaining fairness. (Para 14 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. arbitrary replacement practices undermine education quality and violate constitutional employment principles. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. petitioner allowed to continue until regular appointments made, reinforcing constitutional job security. (Para 35) |
ORDER
The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India , seeking the following main prayer:-
“……..declaring the Circular No.RU/ Teaching.Estt./Circular/2017 dated 18.05.2017 issued by the 1stRespondent as arbitrary illegal malafide discriminatory and unconstitutional violating Article 14 , 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and issue consequential directions restraining the Respondents from replacing the Petitioner by any other contract lecturer in pursuance of the Circular No.RU
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
