Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SRI RAVI NATH TILHARI, SRI MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, JJ
M ANIGIRI RAMESH BABU – Appellant
Versus
G AJULA VENUGOPAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction and appeal details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. filing for injunction slips. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. plaintiff's ownership claim and history. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. respondents' counterclaim and property transactions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. legal arguments of the petitioner. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. respondents' counsel argument. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. moot point on interim orders. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. conditions for granting injunctive relief. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. examining documentation of ownership claims. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 10. analysis of trial court's decisions. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 11. legal standard for irreparable loss. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 12. final order and directions of the court. (Para 68 , 69 , 70) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
Heard Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff and Sri V.V. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel representing Ms.Malladi Aruna, learned counsel for the respondents/respondents. Perused the entire material available on record.
2. The plaintiff filed O.S. No.27 of 2025 on the file of the Court of III Addl. District Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal, for declaration
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
