SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6137

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
ANDHRA PRADESH JUDO ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 7238/2026



APHC010137672026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [0]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7238/2026 Between:

1. A NDHRA PRADESH JUDO ASSOCIATION, REGN.

NO.268/2014, REP BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, B. SREEDHAR, O/O. F1, JUDO HALL, IGMC STADIUM, VIJAYAWADA-520010, EMAIL.

ANDHRADRADESHIUDOASSN@AMAIL.COM/

ANAMRAMAKISHOREREDDV@AMAIL.COM.

2. A NAM RAMA KISHORE REDDY,, S/O. ANAM RAMI REDDY OCC.PRESIDENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH JUDO ASSOCIATION, O/O. F1, JUDO HALL, IGMC STADIUM, VIJAYAWADA-520010, EMAIL.ANDHRADRADESHIUDOASSN@AMAIL.COM/

ANAMRAMAKISHOREREDDV@AMAIL.COM.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, YOUTH AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237.

2. T HE JUDO FEDERATION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, O/O. FI4, GALLI NO. 12, PARWNA ROAD, JAGATPURI, NEW DELHI-110051, 3. T HE SPORTS AUTHORITY OF ANDHRA PRADESH SAAP, INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL STADIUM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue writ or order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of MANDAMU by declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in not considering the Petitioners explanation along with all evidences submit by the Petitioners as a President and General Secretary of the Petitioner Association, dated 06.03.2026 and not issued Electoral College List for conducting general body meeting and elections of the 2nd Respondent federation dated 14.03.2026, at Lemon Tree Hotels, East Delhi mall, (Metro station-Anand Vihar ISBT) Plot No.1, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad- 201010, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to allow the Petitioners for General Body Meeting authorised representatives of the Andhra Pradesh Judo Association, in the interest of the justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. P SARASWATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SPORTS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.7238 of 2026 This Court made the following

ORDER:

The Instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner for the following relief:

“..To Issue writ or order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of MANDAMU by declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in not considering the Petitioners’ explanation along with all evidences submitted by the Petitioners as a President and General Secretary of the Petitioner Association, dated 06.03.2026 and not issued Electoral College List for conducting general body meeting and elections of the 2nd Respondent federation dated 14.03.2026, at Lemon Tree Hotels, East Delhi mall, (Metro station-Anand Vihar ISBT) Plot No.1, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad- 201010, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to allow the Petitioners for General Body Meeting authorized representatives of the Andhra Pradesh Judo Association, in the interest of the justice.”

2. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated

06.03.2026 of the Petitioners.

4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkates

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top