THE STATE OF A.P. vs KARRI RAMI REDDY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6167

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6167

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI, J
THE STATE OF A.P. – Appellant
Versus
KARRI RAMI REDDY – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
For the Respondents: T V JAGGI REDDY

Table of Content
1. overview of the prosecution's case and initial events. (Para 2 , 3 , 6)
2. discussion on the evidence presented and its weight. (Para 14 , 24 , 25)
3. court's reasoning and decision regarding the acquittal. (Para 30 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri C.P.Somayaji, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the appellant/State and Sri K.Satyanandam, learned counsel representing Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent/Accused.

2. The appeal is preferred by theState challenging the judgment dated 31.05.2007 delivered in S.C.329 of 2005 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Kothepeta.

3. The respondent herein is the Accused before the learned Assistant Sessions Court.

4. The trial Court found the respondent/accused not guilty for the charge U/secs.448 and 307 IPC . Accordingly, acquitted the accused U/s.235(1) Cr.P.C. Therefore, the appeal came to be preferred by the State.

5. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they were arraigned before the learned Assistant Sessions Court.

CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:

6. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.04.2005 at about 07.00 p.m. P.W-2 was alone prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 6167

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHB V L N CHAKRAVARTHI, JTHE STATE OF A.P. – AppellantVersusKARRI RAMI REDDY – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI, J
THE STATE OF A.P. – Appellant
Versus
KARRI RAMI REDDY – Respondent