Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
M KESAVA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 10332/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of a writ petition for the execution of warrants issued by a consumer forum. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal of a petition upon the petitioner's request for withdrawal as the purpose is served. (Para 3 , 4) |
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in not executing the Warrants issued by the Honble District Consumer Redressal Forum Guntur in E.A.No.106/2023 in C.C.No.206/2022 highly arbitrary illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to execute the Warrants issued by the Honble District Consumer Redressal Forum Guntur against the 3rd respondent and pass such other order(s)…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Sri M. Kesava Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the purpose of filing the Writ Petition has been served. Hence, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
