Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
GONDU PENTOJI RAO – Appellant
Versus
SRI S SATYANARAYANA IAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. deliberate violation of court orders constitutes contempt. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. the court established the context of the interim order and its violation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. jurisdiction to punish for contempt is essential for preserving judicial authority. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. existing case law reinforces the requirement of adherence to court orders. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. failure to implement judicial orders jeopardizes judicial integrity. (Para 28 , 29 , 34) |
ORDER
Heard Sri V.Padmanabha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The above contempt case is filed complaining violation of the interim order dated 11.07.2024 in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.14563 of 2024.
3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents 2 to 4 therein in not implementing the enhancement of the age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years, in pursuance of Resolution dated 28.04.2022 in the minutes of the 136th meeting of the Board of Directors of A.P. Backward Classes Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, as illegal and arbitrary.
4. An interim order wa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
