APHC010028542026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3328]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2418/2026 Between:

1. V MUNI SHANKAR, S/O. LATE V. MUNI KRISHNA, AGED 41 YEARS R/O. D NO. 19-8-82/F1, YADAVA COLONY, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 517 501 ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.

2. TIRUPATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUDA TIRUPATHI, THIRUPATHI DISTRICT, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN - 517501.

3. THE PLANNING OFFICER, TIRUPATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TUDA), TIRUPATHI, THIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

4. THE TIRUPATHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

5. THE PLANNING OFFICER, TIRUPATHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

6. SMT N DEEPA, W/O. K.KADIRAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-

169/19, SBL COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

7. SRI K KADIRAPPA, S/O. K. CHINNAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-

169/19, SBI COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

8. K VINAY KUMAR, S/O K. KADIRAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-

169/19, SBL COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

9. K DEDEEPYA, , S/O. K. KADIRAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-

169/19, SBL COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

10. K HEMAMALIPI, S/O. K. KADIRAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-

169/19, SBI COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517501.

11. M /S MEGHANA ENGINEERING, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI M./ SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O. M. RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, R/O. 19-8-169/19, SBI COLONY, WARD NO. 19, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT - 517 501 ...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

2. JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA

3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

4. K RAGHU VEER

5. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Heard Sri S.K. Rizwan Ali, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri K.K. Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3, Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5, Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri K. Raghu Veer, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 10 and Sri P. Janardhana Reddy, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.11.

2. In terms of the directions of this Court, the Written Instructions are submitted by Respondent No.4 along with the Survey Report prepared by the Town Surveyor, Municipal Corporation of Tirupati dated 09.02.2026 and other documents. Copies of it are supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the same are taken on record. The Survey Report would indicate that the documents presented by the Petitioner herein as regards the Sale Deed etc. were registered by the GPA Holder by name Sri Paringichetti Dheeraj Kumar (Ex.P.2).

3. Sri P. Janardhana Reddy, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.11, would submit that on account of the dispute raised by the Petitioner, the Respondent No.11 has filed Caveat before the District Judge, Tirupati

4. Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondents Nos.6 to 10, would submit that the said Respondents also have filed Caveat. It is submitted by both the learned Counsel representing the Respondent Nos.6 to 11 that the Petitioner herein, having full knowledge about the filing of the Caveat in the Competent Court namely the District Court, Tirupati, has filed the present Writ Petition by abusing the process of law because the Unofficial Respondents Nos.6 to 11 have not yet filed Counter Affidavit in the Writ Proceedings. They would submit that the Writ Petitioner has secured an Interim Order by misleading the Court by not stating the true fact