Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
K.C.REDDEPPA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
ANUPATI SHILPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commencement of the case and background on the execution proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the delay and rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the merits and implications of allowing a late application. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final outcome of the case. (Para 11) |
Challenging the order dated 25.04.2024 passed in E.A. No.428 of 2023 in E.A No.71 of 2017 in E.A. No.116 of 2016 in Original Execution Petition No.9 of 2015 in Original Suit No.59 of 2015 on the file of the Court of III Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/respondent No.6 under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (for short ‘CPC’).
2. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, being the plaintiffs, filed O.S.No.59 of 2015 for Specific Performance of Agreement of Sale and the said suit was decreed ex parte in their favour. Pursuant to the said decree, they filed E.P.No.09 of 2015 seeking execution and registration of sale deed through Court. The said Execution Petition was allowed and accordingly a registered sale deed was executed in favour of respondent No.1 through the process of the Court. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
