##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:11941

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:11941

THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 509/2013

Between:

1. D ASARI VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O (LATE) APPALA NAIDU, AGE: 33

YEARS, OCC: WORKING AS FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O

LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL,

VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE

COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT,

HYDERABAD.

2. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT

AGENCY -UNDER MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL

EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, VIZIANAGARAM,

VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

3. T HE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,

SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased toIssue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature

of writ of mandamus declaring the Proceedings of the 2nd Respondent vide

letter No.1409/12/EGS/CS-1 Dated 16.07.2012 which is arbitrary, bad and

illegal and contrary to law and non application of mind and violation of Article-

14 of the Constitution of India and violation of principles of natural justice and

contrary to the Service Conditions and the same liable to be set aside,

consequently direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner as Field

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:11941

Assistant of Lakshmipuram Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram

District, in the interest of justice and pass

IA NO: 3 OF 2013(WPMP 623 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

suspend the order of the 2nd Respondent vide letter No.1409/12/EGS/CS-1

Dated 16.07.2012 by continuing the petitioner as Field Assistant of

Lakshmipuram Village, Seethanagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, in the

interest of justice.

IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 170324 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)

2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV

The Court made the following:

##PAGE4##

4

2026:APHC:11941

Order:-

1. There is no representation for the petitioner.

2. Learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that the

petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal before the District Collector, and

the District Collector has passed an order dated 19.01.2013.

3. Considering the said submission, the proceedings dated 16.07.2012

have already been adjudicated by the competent authority in the appeal. As

such, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on merits, insofar as the

impugned proceedings in the writ petition are concerned. Accordingly, writ

petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________

JUSTICE HARINATH.N

05.02.2026

RMD

223

##PAGE5##

5

2026:APHC:11941

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 509/2013

05.02.2026

RMD

Click Here to Read the rest of this document