HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR
M/s. GALABA MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES – Respondent
WP 14294/2024
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:13944
APHC010276572024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3529]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 14294/2024
Between:
1. M /S. GALABA MANOJ KUMAR, D.NO. 17-25-1/1, WARD NO.21,
RENUKAMMA TEMPLE LANE, BOSE NAGAR, CHIRALA
PRAKASAM DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES, NELLORE
COST RANGE, MAGUNTA LAYOUT - NELLORE.
2. T HE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, GST BHAVAN-
C.R. BUILDINGS, KANNAVARI THOTA-GUNTUR.
3. U NION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY
OF FINANCE, 3RD FLOOR, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANSAD
MARG-NEW DELHI-110001.
4. T HE CHIRALA MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
CHIRALA, BAPATLA DIST.
5. T HE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PR DIVISION, O/O THE
SUPERINTENDED ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE,
ONGOLE-PRAKASAM DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S):
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:13944
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased tomay be pleased to issue any order or direction more particularly
one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order
or direction declaring the assessment Proceedings of the 1st respondent,
passed in 010 No - NLR -AC-13-2023-24-ADJN- ST, Dated 12.04.2024
served on 22.05.2023 (Annexure P-1) for levy of service tax on Works
contract services provided to the 4th and 5th respondents for the tax period
Apnl-2016 to June-2017, is contrary to the exemption granted at entry No.
12A Notification No. 25/20121 -Service tax dated 20.06.2012 inserted Vide
Notification No.9/2016-ST dt. 01.03.2016 (Annexure P-2), and more
particularly is not a service as per interpretation at Sec. 65(B)(44) of Service
Tax -CHAPTER-V of Finance Act 1994(herein after referred to as the Act)
and without considering the letter of objections dt. 09.12.2021 (Annexure P-
3), filed by the petitioner is against to principles of natural justice, as arbitrary,
barred by limitation of time and without jurisdiction. Hence, the proceedings of
the 1st respondent is liable to be set aside and pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings, pursuant to the
impugned Proceedings of the 1st Respondent, in 010 No - NLR -AC-13-2023-
24-ADJN-ST, Dated 12.04.2024 served on 22.05.2023 pending disposal of the
above writ petition, as otherwise, the petitioner would be put to severe loss
and hardship
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K ADI SIVA VARA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D NAGARAJA KUMARI
2. Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema
Region
3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:13944
The Court made the following order:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)
The petitioner is a contractor who executes works contract given by
various authorities as well as sub-contracts given by the main contractor. The
Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax , who is arrayed as the 1st respondent
herein had initiated proceedings, under the Service Tax regime, contained in
the Finance Act, 1994, for the period 2016-2017 and 2017-2018, on the basis
of Form 26AS, which was available with the Income-tax Department, setting
out the TDS deducted, by various persons, in relation to payments made to
the petitioner. The 1st respondent after giving an opportunity of hearing and
opportunity to place all the relevant records, to the petitioner, had passed an
order of assessment, dated 12.04.2024, bringing to tax the turnover of the
petitioner for the said period. Aggrieved by this order of assessment, the
petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present writ petition.
2. The 1st respondent had sought to levy service tax on the turnovers of
the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.