HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
THE MANAGEMENT OF LEKCON INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial scrutiny on the genuineness of delay justification. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. proper exercise of judicial discretion in condoning delay. (Para 7) |
ORDER:
1. The instant Criminal Revision Case is preferred against the order dated 31.05.2024, passed in Crl.M.P.No.182 of 2023, under Rule 127 of the Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders 1990, read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act , 1963 whereby the learned Sessions Judge has condoned the delay of 1803 days in filing a Criminal Revision petition.
2. The brief facts of the case are that initially, Crime No.2 of 2016 of Dumbriguda Police Station, Visakhapatnam, was registered against the petitioners under Sections 41 , 102 and 120(b)of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 [for short „IPC ’], Section 13 (2) of the ( Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act , 1967 [for short, „the UAPA Act‟] and Sections 4 and 20(A) of the Telegraphic Act 1885 [for short, „the Telegraphic Act‟] After completion of the investigation, the police filed a charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Araku, who has taken cognizance of the offence and numbered it as C.C.No.30 of 2017. Thereafter, the accused filed a petition Crl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.