SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7666

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Shaik Chand Begum – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 3112/2026



##PAGE1##

1

2026:APHC:4776

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

WRIT PETITION NOS:2867, 2870, 2892, 3045, 3096 & 3112 of 2026

COMMON ORDER:

These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of the India seeking to declare the action of the

respondents in evicting the petitioners from shop Nos.02, 07, 06, 08,

03 & 04, Dr.P.Anand DSA Mini Stadium, Ongole without considering

and passing a detailed speaking order on the petitioners’ replies dated

05.01.2026 submitted in response to the notice dated 02.01.2026, as

illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India

and consequently to direct the respondents to set aside the notice

issued by the 4th respondent dated 02.01.2026 and pass such other

orders.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.Sai

Narayana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.

3. Whereas, the relief claimed in all the writ petitions and

respondents are common in all these Writ Petitions, hence, this Court

is inclined to pass a common order in all the writ petitions and the

facts stated at W.P.No.2867 of 2026 were drawn to pass this common

order.

4. The case of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner is

existing lessee in respect of Shop No. 02 at D.P.Anand DSA Mini

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:4776

Stadium, Ongole. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as

per Clause 1 of the lease agreement dated 28.09.2022, after

completion of the existing lease period, the petitioner is entitled for

renewal of lease for another period of three years subject to a

condition of enhancing @ 33.33% upon the existing lease amount. In

accordance with the conditions of lease agreement, the petitioner

submitted his renewal application by endorsing his consent for

enhancing like @ 33.33% upon existing lease amount for renewal of

lease period for another period of three years. Even after submission

of renewal applications/representations, without considering the

same, the respondents are taking steps for eviction of petitioner.

Having no other option, the petitioner approached this Court by way

of Writ Petition No.26960 of 2025, wherein this Court while disposing

of the writ petition was pleased to pass final orders and directed the

respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders upon the

petitioner’s renewal application. Till then, the petitioner could not be

evicted from his respective premises. While so, without passing any

orders as directed by this Court, respondent No.4 got evicted the

petitioners forcefully and violated the orders of this Court. Further,

respondent No.4 is taking steps to grant lease hold rights afresh,

without considering the request of the petitioners for renewal as per

the terms of the lease agreement. Hence, the Writ Petition.

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:4776

5. Learned Standing Counsel for Sports Authority was

directed to get instructions. As per the instructions, it is stated that

respondent No.4 neither passed any speaking order as directed by

this Court nor replied by way of any proceedings after receipt of the

renewal application of the petitioner. He further submits that, in fact

the petitioner along with others who are the petitioners in other writ

petitions were already evicted from their respective premises, since

the lease period was completed by the date of order of this Court. He

further submits that so far the respondent No.4 not initiated any steps

for conducting fresh auction for granting lease. He also submits that

the petitioner and others have to pay arrears towards rental amount

pertaining to previous lease period by such they violated the terms of

the lease agreement. As such the petitioners are not entitled to seek

for compliance of the terms of the lease agreement.

6. Heard both the learned counsel and perused the material

placed on record. In fact, the petitioner is existing lessee and

submitted an application for renewal of lease period as per the terms

of the lease agreement. The Clause-I of the terms of the lease

agreement dated 28.09.2022 is clear and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top