HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR
M/s.SRI VENKATESWARA OIL AND FOOD PRODUCTS – Appellant
Versus
The Commercial Tax Officer – Respondent
WP 4358/2018
##PAGE1##
2026:APHC:3147
APHC010098962018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3529]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 4358/2018
Between:
1. M /S.SRI VENKATESWARA OIL AND FOOD PRODUCTS,,
D.NO.2-149/ 2, CHERUVU BAZAR, NEAR MUTHYALAMMA
TEMPLE, JAGGAIAHPET-521 175, KRISHNA DIST.REP BY ITS
PROPRIETOR, E.SANJEEV KUMAR,
...PETITIONER
AND
1. T HE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, NANDIGAMA CIRCLE, NO-I
DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA.
2. A PPELLATE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CT, VIJAYAWADA..
3. S TATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE (CT) DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in
the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other
appropriate writ or order or direction declaring that the order of the 2nd
respondent dated 12-12-2017 rejecting admission of appeal as arbitrary,
illegal, against the provisions of AP VAT Act and also against the
principles of natural justice, set aside the same and consequently direct
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:3147
the 2nd respondent to entertain and decide the appeal filed bny the
petitioner for the period 01-09-2010 to 31-03-2012 on merits and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of collection of disputed tax
raised for the period 01-09-2010 to 31-03-2012 till the disposal of the
above Writ petition and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased To issue a Writ oaf Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or
order or direction declaring that the order of the 2nd respondent dated
12.2.2017 rejecting admission of appeal as arbitrary, illegal, against the
provisions of AP VAT act and also against the principles of natural Justice
set aside the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to
entertain and decide the appeal filed by the petitioner for the period
01.09.2010 to 31.03.2012 on merits and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P BALAJI VARMA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP)
2. S SURI BABU
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:3147
T he Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.C.D. Sekhar)
Questioning the order dated 12.12.2017 passed by the 2nd
respondent in rejecting the admission of appeal filed by the petitioner, the
present writ petition is filed.
2. The petitioner is a registered VAT dealer on the rolls of 1st
respondent having engaged in the business of purchase and sale of
vegetable oils within the State. In addition to the same, the petitioner also
engaged in purchase and sale of pulses and paddy. The 1st respondent
conducted audit on the accounts of the petitioner for the tax period 2010-
11 and 2011-12, which culminated in passing of assessment order dated
30.04.2012, through which tax amounting to Rs.2,07,53,383/- was
demanded, on the ground that the petitioner had claimed excess Input
Tax Credit, under declaration of turn over etc.
3. Aggrieved by the said assessment order, the petitioner filed appeal
and after hearing the matter, the 2nd respondent by order dated
20.06.2012, partly remanded and partly allowed by directing the 1st
respondent to obtain the reports from the Territorial Commercial Tax
Officers, whether the sellers of petitioner had disclosed the turnover
claimed by the petitioner to the department during the relevant period.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that, it received notice dated
14.09.2017 from the 1st respondent raising a demand of Rs.3,89,12,566/-
towards tax and penalty for the period 2009-10 to 2011-12. It is further
##PAGE4##4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.