Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
BATTU DEVANAND, A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, JJ
SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, A – Appellant
Versus
NAMMI VENKATA SURYA PRAKASA RAO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview and context of the land acquisition appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against the compensation awarded. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on market value and relevant legal precedents. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. discussion on the validity of assessed market value. (Para 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. final decision and outcome of the appeal. (Para 15) |
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma)
Introductory:-
[i] Appeal in LAAS No.126 of 2019 is filed under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Act 30 of 2013] r/w Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and directed against an award passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada in LAOP No.104 of 2015 dated 01.05.2019.
[ii] The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) and Land Acquisition Officer, Vijayawada, who made reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is the appellant herein. Cross-Objections are made by the claimants vide Cross-Objections No.36 of 2024.
Facto matrix:-
2. [i] Since the appeal and the Cross-Objections are pertaining to fixation of fair compens
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
