SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22545

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
M MUNIRAJULU – Appellant
Versus
SUMATHI – Respondent


APHC010025562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 254/2025 Between:

1. M MUNIRAJULU, S/O M. KRISHNAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-365, NEAR RAITHU BAZAAR K.R.PALLI, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. S UMATHI, D/O LATE NANDA GOPAL NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. RESIDING AT D.NO. 9-299, GURRAPPA NAIDU STREET CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. G HARIPRASAD, S/O LATE G. SEKHAR NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. RESIDING AT D.NO. 9-299, GURRAPPA NAIDU STREET, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. M SAVITRI, W/O M. MUNIRAJULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC.

HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-365, NEAR RAITHU BAZAAR K.R.PALLI, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. K GEETHA, W/O SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

RESIDING AT D.NO. 2-349, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, SATHYANARAYANAPURAM CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

RESPONDENTS NO. 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed here

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top