HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J
K. Vatchala – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department and 2 others – Respondent
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Sateesh Kumar Eerla, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation appearing for Respondent No.2. Heard Sri Namineni Pavan Kumar, learned Counsel for the Impleadment Applicant in I.A.No.2 of 2026.
2. The prayer sought in the present Writ Petition is as under:
“It is humbly prayed that this Hon‟ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Notice No. 221/1012/TPT/UC/2025, Dated 22.01.2026 issued under Section 636 of AP Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (for Short the Act') by the 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary and without considering the petitioner pending BPS Application No. BP2025/TIR/TPT/1/011835 dated 31-12-2025 as per G.O. M.S. No. 225 dated 12.11.2025 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and violation of the Arts 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps for demolition of the structures made by the petitioner premises D.No.22-5-100, Sy.No. 353/3, Thimmanaidupalem Revenue Village, Tirupati Mandal, Election Ward No-1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.