SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8426

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
P Murali Shyam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 13120/2018



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:18659

APHC010289272018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3368]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION NO: 13120/2018

Between:

1. P MURALI SHYAM, S/O P RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47

YEARS, OCC. PRESIDENT OF TELUGUNADU JUTE KARMIKA

SANGHAM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D NO. 7C -9-9,

PALADUGU RAMARAO VEEDHI, 7TH DIVISION, ELURU,

WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT

BUILDING, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR

DISTRICT

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, ELURU, WEST

GODAVARI DISTRICT,

3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, ZONE - 11,

ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,

4. THE MANAGING DIRECTO, SRI KRISHNA JUTE MILL,

ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT RESPONDENTS

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that

in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High

Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of

Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or the action of the

respondents 1 to 4 not paying the pending bonus amount to workers of

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:18659

the 4th respondent mill for the year 2014-2015 by considering the

representations dated 19.12.2017 and 01.03.2018 as illegal arbitrary

and volatile of Article 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and

consequently direct the 4th respondent to release and pay the pending

bonus to the workers here in and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court

may be pleased to direct the 4th respondents here in to pay the

pending enhanced bonus to the workers of the 4th respondent mill for

the year 2014-2015 as per the Gazette Notification dated 01.01.2016

pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M K RAJ KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP)

The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:18659

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No.13120 OF 2018

ORDER:

Sri G.Sai Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri M.K.Raj

Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner sought permission to

withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There

shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in

this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

______________________________

JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

28.01.2026

Pmk

##PAGE4##

4

2026:APHC:18659

45

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No:13120 OF 2018

Date: 28.01.2026

Pmk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top