SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22653

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN
Smt.Indrani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 19039/2022



##PAGE1##

2025:APHC:1070980

APHC010317912022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3233]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 19039/2022

Between:

1. S MT.INDRANI, W/O PERUMAL, AGE 53 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE,

RIO H.NO.3-35, KANAMAPACHARLAPALLE VILLAGE,

KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT

CHITTOOR.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KUPPAM REVENUE

DIVISION, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, KUPPAM MANDAL AT KUPPAM, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in

the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court

may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or

direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus

declaring the action of the respondents in trying to disposses the

petitioner from the land an extent of Ac.03-00 cents out of Ac.10-50

##PAGE2##

2

2025:APHC:1070980

cents in Sy.No.67, situated at Kanamapacharlapalle Village, Kuppam

Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles

of natural justice and consequently direct the 'respondents not to

disposses the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.03-00 cents out

of Ac.10-50 cents in Sy.No.67, situated at Kanamapacharlapalle Village,

Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, except due process of law and to

pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may

be pleased to direct the respondent not to disposses the petitioner from

the land to an extent of Ac.03-00 cents out of Ac.10-50 cents in

Sy.No.67, situated at Kanamapacharlapalle Village, Kuppam Mandal,

Chittoor District, abruptly without following the due process of law,

pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may

be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order order dated 07.07.2022

in W.P.No.19039 of 2022 and also dismiss the writ petition and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may

be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to file reply in W.P.No.19039

of 2022 and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

##PAGE3##

3

2025:APHC:1070980

The Court made the following Order:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the

respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land in an

extent of Ac.3.00 cents out of Ac.10.50 cents in Sy.No.67, situated at

Kanamapacharlapalle Village, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.

3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader

relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent submits that there are

illegal encroachments in the land in Sy.No.67 of Kanamapacharlapalle

village of Kuppam Mandal and the petitioner also illegally encroached

the government land and when she was approached, the petitioner and

her henchmen abused and came down heavily with a filthy language

and recklessly challenged that she does not want to disclose any type

of document and confronted with the staff in a gruesome manner and

the 5th respondent is not yet proceeded with any removal of

encroachments activities of the land in Sy.No.67 of

Kanamapacharlapalle village. But the action for removal of

encroachments in an extent of 10.50 cents in Sy.No.67 of the said

village is under process. Originally, the l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top