SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22730

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K Sreenivasa Reddy, J
Boya Rambabu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 22613/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Butta Vijaya Bhasker
For the Respondents: GP for Animal Husbandry, GP for Home, GP for Revenue

Government authorities must adhere to the due process of law for the eviction of persons from government land, ensuring that dispossession is not arbitrary, particularly when standing crops are involved.

Headnote:The petitioners, who are agriculturists from a socially and economically weaker community, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent their dispossession from government land in Sy.Nos. 298/1, 299, 300, and 301 in Banavasi Village, Kurnool District. They contended that they had been cultivating the land for ten years and had standing crops, and that the respondents' attempts to evict them were arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The court examined whether the respondents could dispossess the petitioners without following the due process of law. It was observed that while the Record of Rights (ROR) classifies the land as government poramboke and it was notified under Section 22-A (1) (b) to prevent unauthorized transfer, the presence of standing crops necessitated a legal approach to eviction. Therefore, this Court directs the respondents-authorities to adhere to the procedure contemplated under law in case the subject land is required, for evicting the petitioners.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring action of the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent in seeking to dispossess the petitioners from the land in Sy.No. 298/1, 299, 300 and 301 to an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents each, situated at Banavasi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Art. 14 and , 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective extent of land in Sy.No. 298/1, 299, 300 and 301 to an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents each, situated at Banavasi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to the DIRECT the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the land in Sy.No.298/1, 299, 300 and 301 to an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents each, situated at Banavasi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of above writ petition and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 22.08.2022 passed in WP No 22613 of 2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass

The Court made the following:

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Animal Husbandry representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, learned Government Pleader for Home representing respondent No.4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing respondent No.5. Perused the entire material available on record. With the consent of learned counsel for both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of, at admission stage.

This Writ Petition was filed seeking the following relief:

“to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly, 3rd respondent in seeking to dispossess the petitioners from the land in Sy.Nos.298/1, 299, 300 and 301 to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents each situated at Banavasi village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective extent of land in Sy.Nos.298/1, 299, 300 and 301 to an extent of Ac.0.50 cents situated at Banavasi village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order or orders …’

Contents of the affidavit filed by 1st Writ Petitioner, in brief, are that all the petitioners are permanent residents of Banavasi village, Yemmiganur Mandal of Kurnool District and all belonged to socially and economically weaker community and they live by doing cultivation and agricultural coolie works; that the petitioners were in occupation of Ac.0.50 cents of land each in Sy.Nos.298/1, 299, 300 and 301 situated at Banavasi village, Yemmiganur Mandal of Kurnool District, belonged to the Government for the past ten years and at present, there is standing crop viz. custard, groundnut, paddy, cotton and vegetable crops in the said land, aged about 4 months and after four months the crop would be ready for harvest.

(b) Earlier, respondent No.3 issued Notice dated 11.11.2024 to some of the petitioners, directing them to vacate the land; that the petitioners, who received notice, approached the respondent No.3 and requested him not to dispossess them from the said land, as the said land was unused; that subsequently, the respondents did not take steps for evi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top