SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22830

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
Dr. Kartheek Thota – Appellant
Versus
Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Science Tirumala – Respondent
WP 16486/2014



A medical board's reassessment of a non-progressive disability to a higher percentage is unsustainable if it contradicts a prior valid certificate, especially when the candidate was previously found fit for a similar course.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Writ of Mandamus - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Medical Council of India Circular dated 14.07.2003 - Disability assessment for admission to medical courses - The Medical Board's assessment of disability beyond 70% for a candidate with a non-progressive disability (Post-Polio Residual Paralysis) previously certified at 65% was held unsustainable. The court emphasized that when a candidate was previously found fit for an MBBS course with a non-progressive disability, it is highly improbable for the disability percentage to increase. The court made absolute its order for provisional admission for the petitioner. (Paras 15, 16, 17)

(B) Administrative Law - Medical Board - Scope of assessment - The role of the Medical Board is to verify the disability percentage, not to reassess it arbitrarily, especially when the disability is non-progressive and previously certified. The procedure adopted using SADAREM was not specified in the prospectus, and the Medical Board was only to ensure the candidate is fit for the course. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, suffering from Post-Polio Residual Paralysis with a 65% permanent disability (certified by Government General Hospital, Kakinada), applied for a Post Graduate (M.D. Radiology) course. He secured the highest rank among PH category candidates. The respondent-Institute's Medical Board assessed his disability at 87%, deeming him ineligible (as the permissible range was 50-70%), and offered the seat to the 4th respondent whose disability was assessed at 51%. The petitioner challenged this rejection.

Findings of Court:
The court found the Medical Board's assessment of 87% disability unsustainable. The petitioner's disability was non-progressive, and he had previously been certified fit for an MBBS course. It was highly improbable for the disability to increase. The court made absolute its interim order granting the petitioner provisional admission and directed the respondent to declare his final examination results.

Issues: The main issues were whether the Medical Board's assessment of the petitioner's disability at 87% was valid and whether the petitioner's candidature was wrongly rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that for a non-progressive disability, the percentage cannot increase over time. Therefore, the Medical Board's assessment contradicting a previously valid certificate was unsustainable. The balance of convenience favored the petitioner, and the interim order granting provisional admission was made absolute.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of. Respondent No.1 directed to declare the petitioner's M.D. Radiology final examination results and provide the certificate. Interim order granting provisional admission made absolute. No order as to costs. (Para 17) Parties Involved: Petitioner (Dr. Kartheek Thota), Respondents (Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Science, Medical Board, Medical Council of India, Sri Bhaskar Rao Sangareddy). Dissenting Opinions: None."

Table of Content
1. factual background and contentions of parties regarding disability assessment for medical admission. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court heard arguments from both sides. (Para 6)
3. court's analysis on disability assessment and interim orders for medical admission. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final order directing declaration of petitioner's exam result. (Para 17)

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“…to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ

(i) declaring the action of respondents in rejecting the candidature of the petitioner for admission into P.G. Course on the premise that disability of the petitioner in lower limbs is above 70% as illegal, arbitrary and unjust;

(ii) declare that 4th respondent’s selection in preference to the Writ Petitioner is illegal and arbitrary;

(iii) consequently, set-aside the selection of 4th respondent for admission into MD Radiology; and,

(iv) direct 1st respondent to admit the petitioner in MD Radiology course against Roster Point No.31 (PH) in place of 4th respondent and pass such other order or orders…”

2. Contents of the affidavit, filed by the Writ Petitioner, in support of the Writ Petition, in brief, are that, he has been suffering from Post Polio Residual Paralysis since 3rd year of his birth; that the percentage of disability in terms of Medical Certificate issued by the Government General Hospital, Kakinada is 65% Permanent Disability in lower limbs; that in spite of physical disability in the lower limbs, it had not caused any hindrance to the petitioner to continue his education.

(b) The Medical Council of India issued Circular dated 14.07.2003 prescribing the guidelines for filling up of seats reserved for the persons having locomotive disability for admission into the Medical Courses, wherein, it was stated that the persons with disability in the lower limbs between 50% and 70% should be allowed the benefit of reservation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 for admission into the Medical Courses. The Central Government also issued letter bearing F.No.U.12021/ 8.202-MEC/ME-III, dated 12.05.2004 to consider the candidates for 3% quota having regard to disability to lower limbs between 50% and 70%; that the petitioner got (free seat) admission in Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada in the year 2006 and accordingly, he joined in MBBS course and successfully completed the said course including Internship in the year 2012.

(c) The petitioner applied for Post Graduate Medical course offered by Dr.N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada for the Academic Year 2013 with Hall Ticket No.516743 and secured 4359 rank; that the disability percentage of petitioner was assessed at 65%, but with the rank of 4359, the petitioner could not get seat of his choice; that one Bhaskar Rao Sangareddy, belonged to BC-D community, also appeared in the said examination with Hall Ticket No.532065 and he secured 7213 rank and his disability was fixed at 40% - 50%.

(d) That Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences issued prospectus SVIMSPGET-2014 invited applications to Post Graduate (MD) course for May, 2014 Session and notified 17 seats; that it was stated therein that in case, Medical Council of India permits for increase of seats in the existing course or permits new course(s), they would be filled from the merit list of the Entrance Test conducted by the University; that in pursuance of the said Notification, petitioner applied for the course and secured 73 marks in the Entrance examination and possessed 60.98% in MBBS course; that the petitioner secured 387 rank in the written examination; that 1st respondent drawn up provisional list of PGET- 2014 (Merit-wise) under PH Category and in the merit list comprising of 21 candidates, the petitioner name was at Serial No.1, as he secured highest marks in the PH Category candidates and one Bhask

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top