SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8788

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K SREENIVASA REDDY
PASUPULETI CHINA CHENNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Sri N.Ashwani Kumar, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri B.Somasekhar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and learned Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.5 and 6.

2. The Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the Look-out Circular (LoC) vide Ref.No.2025/10031/002706 dated 17.04.2025 issued by respondent No.2 notifying the presence of Writ Petitioner as an accused, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (a), 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Office Memorandum, dated 27.10.2010 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (Foreign Division) No.250163/31/2010-Imm, and declare the action of respondent No.4 in not renewing the Passport of the Writ Petitioner vide No.N5750211, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of provisions of the Passports Act, 1967 (for brevity „the Act, 1967‟) and consequently, direct the respondent No.4 to renew the passport for a period of 10 (Ten) years in terms of the Passports Act, 1967.

3. Contents of the affidavit filed by the Writ Petitioner, in brief, are that the Writ Petitioner went to Australia in the y

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top