SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
THAMMANENI BHASKAR REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO: 6137/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Pillix Law Firm
For the Respondents: GP for Home

The court affirmed that police authorities are mandated to register a complaint if it discloses a cognizable offence, ensuring compliance with the procedural requirements of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, alleging that the respondent authority failed to register a crime based on a report dated 22.01.2026, which is in violation of Chapter XIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution. The court noted that the complaint had not been registered as a case in accordance with the prescribed procedure. The central issue is whether the police are obligated to register a complaint when it discloses a cognizable offence. The court reasoned that the complaint must be considered and processed according to the law, specifically the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent No.3 to register the complaint dated 22.01.2026 submitted by the Petitioner if it discloses a cognizable offence, in accordance with law.

Table of Content
1. failure of police to register a criminal complaint despite the submission of a report. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. mandatory registration of a complaint if it discloses a cognizable offence. (Para 5)

The Court made the following:

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“… toissueanappropriate writorder or directionmore particularlyone inthe natureofwritofmandamusdeclaringthattheinactionofrespondentsno3in not registering the Crime against respondent no 4 to 7 and not taking any action as per the provisions of Chapter XIII of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 on the report given by the petitioner dated 22012026 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice Article 21 300A and consequently direct the respondents no 3 to forthwith register a crime against the respondents no 4 to 7 and the other culprits on the report given by the petitioner dated 2201 2026 as per the provisions of Chapter XIII of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha 2023 in the interest of justiceandequityandtopass…”

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

3. Sri P.Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that a complaint dated 22.01.2026 was submitted by the Petitioner to the Respondent No.3, but the same was not registered as a case in accordance with the procedure as contemplated under ‘BNSS’.

4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the Writ Petition may be disposed of directing to consider the complaint by Respondent No.3.

5. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent No.3 to register the complaint dated 22.01.2026 submitted by the Petitioner if it discloses a cognizable offence, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top