SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9042

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
D.R.Rao E-600601 Driver – Appellant
Versus
The APSRTC rep. By its Managing Director – Respondent


APHC010398372013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29815/2013 Between:

1. D .R.RAO, E-600601, DRIVER,, D.R.RAO, E-600601, DRIVER, APSRTC, S/O ABBULU, 38 YRS, R/O GOKAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE APSRTC REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHIRABAD, HYDERABAD.

2. T HE APSRTC REP BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, E.G. REGION AT RAJAHMUNDRY.

3. T HE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC, GOKAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

4. T HE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in without issuing any fresh charge sheet and not conducting any enquiry and by treating the earlier absence as misconduct, punishing the petitioner for life time by issuing the removal order vide Proc. No. P1/1(32)2012 G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top