SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9189

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN
M RANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 7895/2025



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:19227

APHC010149362025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI [3233]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 7895/2025

Between:

1. M RANI, W/O. M. DORASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC

AGRICULTURE, R/O. MORAVAPALLI COLONY,

BODUMALLUVARIPALLI VILLAGE GUDAREVUPALLIPOST,

CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA

DISTRICT.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA

DISTRICT.

4. T HE TAHSILDAR, PILERU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction. more particularly

one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in

placing the Petitioner land i.e. land measuring 2.0 acres in Survey No. 756-3,

situated in Bodumailuvaripalli Village, Pileru Mandal, Chittoor District in

Dispute Register, and showing as digital signature not done by the Tashildar

as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice and violation

of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently

direct the respondents to remove the land measuring 2.0 acres in Survey No.

##PAGE2##

2

2026:AP H C : 1 9 2 2 7

756-3, situated in Bodumailuvaripalli Village, Pileru Mandal, Chittoor District

from the Dispute Register of the subject land and pass such

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

may be pleased to direct the respondents to considered the application made

by the petitioner on 20-02-205 for remove the land measuring 2.0 acres in

Survey No. 756-3, situated in Bodumalluvaripalli illage, Pileru Mandal,

Chittoor District from the Dispute Register forthwith, pending disposal of the

writ petition and pass such

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BANDI SRIHARI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

##PAGE3##

3

2026:AP H C : 1 9 2 2 7

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in

placing the petitioner’s land i.e., land in an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in

Sy.No.756-3, situated in Bodumalluvaripalli Village, Pileru Mandal, Chittoor

District in the disputed register and showing as the digital signature not done

by the Tahsildar.

3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying

upon the written instructions of the 4threspondent dated 04.02.2026 submits

that the subject land forms part of the D-Form patta and it is an assigned land

and the petitioner purchased it through an unregistered sale agreement

violating the assignment conditions and as such, the subject land is kept in the

Dispute Register in Webland Adandal.

4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without

giving any opportunity to the petitioner, the subject land was placed in the

Dispute Register.

5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is

permitted to make a representation to the 3rd respondent, enclosing all the

necessary documents in support of her claim within a period of four (04)

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. On receipt of such

representation, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the

same strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned,

including the petitioner giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records

##PAGE4##

4

2026:AP H C : 1 9 2 2 7

and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top