##PAGE1##

2025:APHC:61792

APHC010170712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

[3332]

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 9793/2021

Between:

1. B . CHENGALRAYA REDDY, S/O. B. NARASIMHA

REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O.

PERUMALLAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH - 517569.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS

PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO 135, A.P

SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. T HE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS

PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF

PANCHAYETIRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT OFFICE,

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2

2025:APHC:61792

4. T HE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR,

CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

6. T HE DISTRICT PANCHAYETI OFFICER,

VEDURUKUPPAM MD, CHITTOOR DIST.

7. T HE TAHSILDAR, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL,

CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

8. T HE MPDO, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR

DIST.

9. T HE GRAMA PANCHAYETI, PERUMALLAPALLI

VILLAGE, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the

High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ Order or direction

particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the

action of the respondents in proceeding for construction of

RYTHU BHAROSA KENDRAM over the petitioners property an

extent ofAc.0.60 cents in Survey No. 108/5 at Perumallapalli

village of Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor district, without

passing any resolution of Grama Panchayeti and conducting of

any Grama Sabha as contemplated in GO MS NO 188 dated

21.07.2011 issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh and Sec 4(3)

and 6 (2) of THE ANDHRA PRADESH PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT,

1994as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural

justice and also Article 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of

India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess

the petitioner from his land without following the procedure

established by law

3

2025:APHC:61792

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the

petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the

respondents not to proceed further in making any construction

over the petitioners property an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Survey

No. 108/5 at Perumallapalli village of Vedurukuppam Mandal,

Chittor district

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

3. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP)

4. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For

Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats

The Court made the following order:

Challenging the action of the respondents in proceeding

with the construction of a Rythu Bharosa Kendram on the

petitioner’s property to an extent of Ac.0.60 cents situated in

Sy.No.108/5 at Perumallapalli Village of Vedurukuppam Mandal,

Chittoor District, without following due process of law, the present

writ petition is filed.

4

2025:APHC:61792

2. Heard Sri Shah, learned counsel representing Sri Jada

Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Sri M. Sudheer, learned Standing Counsel for the Gram

Panchayat, Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while reiterating the

contents of the affidavit, submitted that when the respondent

authorities are proposing to proceed with the construction of a

Rythu Bharosa Kendram on the petitioner’s property without

following due process of law, the pre