APHC010189102014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29127/2014 Between:

1. S MT.KOTHAKOTA NAGARATNAM W/O. RANGANADHAM, OCC:

FIELD MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM

2. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA) SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

3. T HE PROGRAM OFFICER FAC, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

4. T HE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MPDO, ETCHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned proceedings Rc No.444/2014/EGS/HR, dt.11.08.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent removing the petitioner from service as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the rules and regulations of the Panchayat Raj Act and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Field Assistant, Fareedpet Village and Grampanchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 36432 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant, Fareedpet Village and Grampanchayat, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District by suspending the impugned proceedings Rc No.444/2014/EGS/HR, dt.11.08.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass

1. R K SURI

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)

The Court made the following:

Order:-

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

16.03.2026 PNS