SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9794

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
PILLI KRISHNAKANTH – Appellant
Versus
NEELAMSETTY VENKATA SUNIL KUMAR – Respondent


APHC010707502022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2867/2022 Between:

1. P ILLI KRISHNAKANTH, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU, 53 YEARS, D.NO.9-29-7/3, BALAJI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP ...PETITIONER AND

1. N EELAMSETTY VENKATA SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. KATAJI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO.30-12-10, RANGA STREET, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM-20.

...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent:

1.

The Court made the following:

ORDER:-

The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in E.P.No.144 of 2014 in OS No.1916 of 2011 by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. The respondent filed the E.P. seeking to send the petitioner to civil imprisonment on his failure to pay the execution amount. The learned Judge allowed the E.P. and directed the petitioner to civil imprisonment on his failure to pay the execution amount to the respondent. Accordingly, arrest warrant was issued against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top