SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI


[3332](Special Original Jurisdiction)


WRIT PETITION NO: 15464/2025


Between:

1. CHINNA NAGAMMA, W/O. G.NAGANNA, AGE 54 YEARS, OCC F.P.SHOP DEALER, F.P.SHOP.NO. 1219007, R/O. B.T.PROJECT VILLAGE, GUMMAGATTA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT....PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPUR.

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPUR.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALYANDURG, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

5. THE TAHSILDAR, GUMMAGATTA MANDAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S):


Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K NARSI REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES


PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI


MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX


____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI


16.03.2026


RR

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing proceedings Rc.No.B4/451/2025 dated 20.05.2025 by cancelling the authorization of the petitioner as fair price shop dealer of F.P.Shop No. 1219007 of B.T.Project Village, Gummagatta Mandal, Anantapur District without there being any valid reason, without offering personal hearing to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and also violative of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2018 and consequently set-aside the same and further direct the respondents to continue the petitioner to hold F.P.Shop No. 1219007 of B.T.Project Village, Gummagatta Mandal, Anantapur District and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as F.P. shop Dealer and to supply essential commodities to the petitioner’s F.P.Shop No. 1219007 of B.T.Project Village, Gummagatta Mandal, Anantapur District by suspending the proceedings of 4th respondent vide Rc.No.B4/451/2025 dated 20.05.2025, pending disposal of Writ Petition and to pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to vacate the Interim order dated 26.06.2025 l.A. No.1 of 2025 in W.P. No.15464 of 2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass

The Court made the following:

ORDER

Assailing the proceedings issued by respondent No.4-Revenue Divisional Officer, Kalyandurg in Rc.No.B4/451/2025 dated 20.05.2025, whereby the authorization of the petitioner’s Fair Price shop No.1219007 situated at B.T.Project Village, Gummagatta Mandal, Anantapur District was cancelled without any valid reason and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is filed.

The brief facts that led to filing of this Writ Petition are that:

The petitioner was appointed as a Fair Price shop dealer for the subject shop by virtue of proceedings issued by respondent No.4 in D.Dis.No.(f)888/2004, dated 19.06.2004. Subsequently, the officials of respondent Department inspected the shop and allegedly found certain irregularities. Based on the said inspection, the Tahsildar submitted a report to the Revenue Divisional Officer recommending cancellation of the petitioner’s authorization vide letter/report vide RC.No.47/2023/CS, dated 25.06.2023. Pursuant thereto, the Revenue Divisional Officer issued show cause notice vide RC.No.B2/1262/2023 dated 05.07.2023, to which the petitioner submitted her explanation on 30.04.2025. However, respondent No.4 passed orders vide RC.No.B2/1262/2023, dated 28.07.2023 cancelling the petitioner’s authorization without considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner. Assailing the said orders, the petitioner preferred an appeal before respondent no.3-Joint Collector, Anantapur, and vide orders dated 19.07.2024 in Rc.No.K6/436/2023, the said appeal was dismissed confirming the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.18006 of 2024 before this Court and this Court was pleased to dismiss the said writ petition and thereupon the petitioner preferred appeal vide W.A.No.122 of 2025 and the Division Bench of this Court allowed the writ appeal, setting aside the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer as well as Joint Collector and the matter is remitted back to disciplinary authority for fresh consideration for conducting p

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top