SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10597

APHC
Battu Devanand, Subhendu Samanta, JJ
GORINTLA CHANDRA SEKHARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent
WRIT APPEAL No.833 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

An appeal against the dismissal of a writ petition as withdrawn cannot be sustained on allegations of coercion or threat unless such claims are supported by material evidence.

Headnote:The matter involves a Writ Appeal challenging an order dated 09.12.2024 in W.P.No.21485 of 2024. The learned Single Judge had recorded a request from the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the writ petition and subsequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The court examined whether the withdrawal was voluntary. It was observed that while the appellant contended that a respondent had forced and threatened them to withdraw the writ petition, no material evidence was placed before the court to substantiate such claims. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed.

JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

This Writ Appeal is filed against the order, dated 09.12.2024 in W.P.No.21485 of 2024, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the order under appeal.

It appears that the learned Single Judge has recorded the request made by the counsel for the petitioner therein, who sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and after according permission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Though the learned counsel for the appellant contending that the respondent No.7 forced and threatened the appellant/petitioner to withdraw the writ petition before the learned Single Judge, he could not place any material to substantiate the same.

In view of the same, in our considered view, there are no merits in the writ appeal.

Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top