HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
YELLA VASUDEVA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
YELLA PADMAVATHI – Respondent
CRP 324/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:APHC:28611
APHC010039232026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 324/2026
Between:
1. Y ELLA VASUDEVA REDDY, S/O. LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, PRESENTLY
RESIDING AT 7677, BLACK WALUT TRAIL MISSISSAUGA
ONTARIO, CANADA - L5N8A6, REP. BY HIS SPECIAL POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER MUTYALA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O MUTYALA
RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O 7-1-28/A/1/9, PARK
AVENUE COLONY, SHYAM KARAN ROAD, AMEERPET,
HYDERABAD - 500016.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Y ELLA PADMAVATHI, W/O. KONDREDY VENKATA REDDY, AGED
56 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.8-117, MANDIRAM
BAZAAR, KOTHAPETA, KANIGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. Y ELLA VENKATA SUBBAMMA, W/O. LATE VENKATA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O.
KOTHAKUCHIPUDIPALLI, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. Y ELLA SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, C/O. BHARATH PETROL
BUNK, PAMUR ROAD, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. Y ELLA VISWANADHA REDDY, , S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.
##PAGE2##2
2026:APHC:28611
KOTHAKUCHIPUDIPALLI, KANIGIRI TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the
circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be
pleased topleased to set aside Order dated 12-01-2026 passed in I.A. No.31
of 2026 in O.S. No.04 of 2026 on the file of the Principal District Judge,
Ongole, at Parkasam District, and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Docket Order
dated 12-01-2026 passed in l.A.No.31 of 2026 in O.S.No.04 of 2026 on the
file of the Principal District Judge, Ongole, at Parkasam District, in the interest
of justice.
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to permit Mutyala Krishna Reddy, S/o Mutyala Rami Reddy, aged
about 62 years, R/o 7-1-28/A/1/9, Park Avenue Colony, Shyam Karan Road,
Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500016, to represent the petitioner in the captioned
CRP and to sign, verify and file all necessary pleadings, affidavits and
documents for the conduct of the case, in the interest of justice, and to pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 12-01-2026 passed in
I.A. No.31 of 2026 in O.S. No.04 of 2026 on the file of the Principal District
Judge, Ongole, at Parkasam District, pending disposal of the above Civil
Revision Petition, and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
##PAGE3##3
2026:APHC:28611
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 324/2026
ORDER:-
The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India challenging the order dated 12.01.2026 passed in I.A.No.31 of 2026 in
O.S.No.4 of 2026 on the file of the Principle District Judge, Ongole.
2. The petitioner herein is defendant No.3, respondent No.1 is plaintiff
and respondent Nos.2 to 4 are defendant Nos.1, 2 and 4 in the suit. For the
convenience of the Court, the parties herein are referred as arrayed in the
suit.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the suit is filed for partition by the
plaintiff against the defendants. The plaintiff also filed an application under
Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 r/w 151 of C.P.C., for ad-interim injunction against the
defendants. Wherein, the trial Court without issuing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.