Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Ninala Jayasurya, J
Anusuri Krishna and Others – Appellant
Versus
Kakarla Govindu and Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property ownership and measurement framework established. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the legitimacy of the appointment of advocate commissioner. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the discretion given in appointing advocate commissioner. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 25) |
| 4. importance of measuring and not gathering evidence. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision on the revision petition. (Para 26) |
The Court made the following Order:
The 1st respondent in the Revision Petition is the plaintiff, who filed a suit in O.S.No.496 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, against the Revision Petitioners herein and others stating inter alia, that originally the plaint schedule property admeasuring Ac.1.15 cents was owned by Smt.Gangabathula Sooramma, who purchased the same through registered Sale Deed dated 15.02.1966 and on her demise, the said land was devolved upon her son one Mr.Gangabathula Gandhi and on his death, the same was devolved upon his eight children by way of succession, that they got divided their land into house plots and the 1st respondent purchased Plot Nos.7 & 8 through Registered Sale Deed and is in possession and enjoyment of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
