SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10862

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B V L N Chakravarthi, J
Chandrakanthi John – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No: 260/2009



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ramakrishna Akurthi
For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor (AP), C.P.Somayaji, Sandeep

The conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder is upheld where eyewitness testimony is credible and consistent with medical evidence, and where the recovery of the weapon is supported by a voluntary discovery statement under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 304-II - Culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Conviction - Prosecution witnesses, being relatives of deceased, successfully established the incident - No evidence to impeach credit of witnesses - Medical evidence corroborated eyewitness testimony regarding stab wound to the heart - Discovery of weapon pursuant to confessional statement under Section 27 of Evidence Act, 1872 is admissible. (Paras 22, 24, 25)

(B) Appeal - Scope - Power to interfere with well-reasoned judgment of trial court - Appellate court finding no material to disbelieve eyewitness testimony or grounds to interfere. (Paras 22, 27)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted under Section 304-II IPC for the death of the deceased following a quarrel over a small sum of money. The prosecution alleged the appellant returned to the scene armed with a knife and stabbed the deceased in the chest.

Findings of Court:
The testimony of eyewitnesses, supported by medical evidence and the recovery of the weapon via the appellant's disclosure, established the guilt of the appellant.

Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 304-II IPC was sustainable and whether there were grounds to interfere with the trial court's judgment.

Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of evidence impeaching the credibility of eyewitnesses and in view of corroborating medical evidence and weapon discovery under the Indian Evidence Act, the trial court's finding of culpability is upheld.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appellate jurisdiction and trial court judgment challenges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. summary of prosecution evidence and trial findings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. summary of arguments by opposing parties. (Para 14 , 15)
4. analysis of witness testimony and corroborate evidence. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. confirmation of criminal conviction and dismissal of appeal. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

O R A L J U D G M E N T:

Heard Sri Ramakrishna Akurthi, learned counsel for the appellant/accused and Sri C.P.Somayaji, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Sri Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.

2. The appeal is preferred challenging the judgment dated 02.09.2008 in S.C.No.408/2007 on the file of VI Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

3. The appellant was convicted for the offence U/s.304-II IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years.

CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:

4. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.04.2007 the marriage of P.W-4’s son was performed in the village. P.W-4 gave Rs.300/- to the accused and three others to provide liquor to the person attended the marriage as per their caste custom. He requested the accused to return the balance amount of Rs.30/-. Later, the accused and others consumed liquor and returned to marriage venue. The deceased asked the accused to return the sum of Rs.30/-. The accused quarreled with the deceased. Thereafter the accused went to home, returned back to the scene of offence, armed with a knife. He stabbed the deceased on the left side of the chest. The deceased made attempt to ward off the blow. The accused again stabbed him on the left hand and ran away. The persons present there shifted the deceased to Government General Hospital at Kunrool. On intimation from the hospital, SI of Police/P.W-8 visited the hospital, recorded statement of P.W-1 vide Ex.P-1, registered the same as case in Cr.No.37/2007 for the offence U/s.302 IPC vide Ex.P-6 FIR and submitted the same to the jurisdictional Magistrate. He informed Inspector of Police/P.W-9 submitting copy of FIR. Therefore, P.W-9 took-up investigation. He examined P.W-1 at Police Station and recorded his statement. He secured P.W-7 and another as mediators, visited hospital and conducted inquest vide Ex.P-2. He examined P.Ws-2 to 5 and recorded their statements, seized M.Os-2 to 5 during the course of inquest. Later, the dead body of deceased was sent for autopsy.

5. Inspector of Police proceeded to the scene of offence, which is located in front of Maremma Temple in Jowharapuram village. He seized blood stained earth and controlled earth under M.Os-7 & 8 in the presence of the mediators P.W-7 and another vide Ex.P-7. He also prepared rough sketch of scene of offence vide Ex.P-8.

6. On 23.04.2007 on credible information, Inspector of Police arrested the accused in the presence of P.W-7 and another and recorded statement of accused. The accused made a confession regarding concealment of weapon i.e., knife/M.O-1 in foam trees near Allah Bakshu Daraga, Kurnool vide Ex.P-4. Basing on the discovery of fact from the confessional statement made by the accused, Inspector of Police seized M.O-1 knife in the presence of the mediators. Later, it was forwarded to FSL through Court with letter of advice vide Ex.P-9.

7. Inspector of Police received FSL report vide Ex.P-12. He also received Ex.P-11 postmortem report issued by P.W-10 opining that doctor found a stab wound on the left side of the chest of the deceased and an incised wound of skin deep over the outer upper part left forearm just below the elbow of the deceased. The doctor, who conducted autopsy, opined that the cause of death could be due to stab injury over the chest.

8. After conclusion of investigation, the Investigation Officer laid charge sheet before the jurisdictional Magistrate,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top