SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11134

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HARINATH.N
Garga Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WP 35963/2012



##PAGE1##

2026:APHC:32824 APHC010076692012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 35963/2012 Between:

1. G ARGA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NUKARAJU, HINDU, AGE 26 YEARS, OCC:FIELD ASSISTANT(UNDER TERMINATION) R/O BHIMAVARAM

VILLAGE & POST, S.RAYAVARAM(M), VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP ITS BY DIST COLLECTIOR/APPELATE AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM,

VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.

2. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.

3. T HE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, S.RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the Therefore its is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue any Writ or Orders more particularly are in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 1 & 2 more particularly the action of 2nd Respondent in issuing proceedings Rc No:144/2012A, Dt:15-5-2012 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article.14, 21 of constitution of India contrary to Circular No.143/SRDS/HR Manual/2009

##PAGE2##

2

2026:APHC:32824 Dt:27-01-2010 and consequently direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner as field assistant of Bhimavaram village, S.Rayavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dist with all incidental and consequential benefits attached to

the post IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 45710 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings Rc NO;144/2012 A, Dt:15/05/2012 issued by the 2nd Respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition and to pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the

circumstances of the case. pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following:

##PAGE3##

3

2026:APHC:32824 Order:-

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the

Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become

infructuous.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall

be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

01.04.2026 PNS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top