SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11233

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
V.SUJATHA
M SAI PRASAD DIED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


APHC010720432022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333]

AT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2/2023 Between:

1. M SAI PRASAD DIED, ( DIED ON 04-05-2022 )

2. M. NALINI,, W/O. M. SAI PRASAD AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O. D.NO.21-11-13/C NEAR GADDE BABURAO STREET MADHURA NAGAR VIJAYAWADA-12 ...APPELLANT(S)

AND

1. UNION OF INDIA, rep. By its General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderbad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. GEETHA MADHURI N S Counsel for the Respondent:

PASALA PONNA RAO (SC FOR CENT GOVT.)

JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO (SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL GOVT.)

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2/2023

J U D G M E N T:

1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (for short (CMA) has been preferred by the Applicants/Claimants aggrieved by the Judgment in Case No.OA/II(u) 307 of 2011 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Amaravathi bench, Guntur, wherein the Tribunal dismissed the claim of the Claimants.

For the sake of convenience, the parties herein afte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top