SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11842

APHC010385572013


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]


(Special Original Jurisdiction)


MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX


PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N


WRIT PETITION NO: 24360/2013


Between:

1. D .ANITHA, W/O.N.NAGARAJU, OCC: UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O.GADEHOTHURU VILLAGE, VAJRAKURUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER


AND

1. T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR.

2. T HE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMAN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ANANTAPUR.

3. T HE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

4. T HE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, URAVAKONDA,

5. S MT PARVATHI W/O SURENDRA, R/O.GADEHOTHURU VILLAGE,

...RESPONDENT(S):


1. S D GOWD

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE


____________________


JUSTICE HARINATH.N


Date.16.03.2026 SR

The Court made the following:

ORDER:-

It is informed that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as the petitioner has challenged the appointment of the 5th respondent as Anganwadi worker instead of preferring the petitioner.

3. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the petitioner claims to have secured more marks in SSC as compared to the 5th respondent and that she is entitled for appointment. It is further submitted that the selection committee has conducted transparent selection and the 5th respondent secured highest marks on merit. It is also submitted that securing more marks in SSC could not grant any additional marks. The 5th respondent secured 43 marks after the selection process was completed and the petitioner secured 31 marks. As such, the selection process cannot be challenged. Considering the submissions and after going through the record, no further orders are required to be passed.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no orders as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top