APHC010318332014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3328]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 872/2014 Between:

1. S MT.NAZIMUNNISA BEGUM W/O LATE N.ASHIM SAB @ ASHIM,, OCC:HOUSE WIFE, R/O 20/165, LALBANDU STREET, OLD TOWN, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DIST.

...PETITIONER AND

1. T HE ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY IT'S MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPUR.

...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SRI O. UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR M.CORPORATION IN RAYALASEEMA REGION IN The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Heard Sri O. Udaya Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation.

2. Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Town Planning Officer (i/c), Municipal Corporation, Ananthapuramu along with the Office Note. Copies of it are supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same are taken on record.

3. The relevant portion of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder:

“Further it is submitted that, on receiving of directions from the Hon'ble High Court, this issue was settled amicably as this corporation had paid an amount of Rs. 57,00,000/- to the petitioner through DD No: 375448 Dated: 14-03-2018 of State Bank of India, Ananthapuramu Branch and got registered the affected road portion of the petitioners land vide Regd. Deed No: 6132/2018 Dated: 11-05-2018.”

4. The above extract would indicates that an amount of Rs.57,00,000/-

was paid to the Petitioner.

5. Sri O. Udaya Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position.

6. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of, as no further consideration is necessary. No order as to costs.

7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 16.03.2026 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 872/2014

16.03.2026 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 872/2014 PROCEEDING SHEET

ORAL ORDER:

Heard Sri Bhaskar Reddy, learned Counsel representing Sri P.

Raghavendra Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Smt.

Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities.

2. In compliance of the Para 2 and 3 of the Order of this Court dated 18.02.2026, Sri Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Municipal Commissioner, Mandapeta, dated 15.03.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record.

3. The relevant portion of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder:

“In this regard, it is respectfully submitted that as per the orders of the Hon'ble High Court, this respondent Municipality has taken Council Resolution No.314 dated 21-02-2026 of Municipal Council, Mandapeta, prepared and submitted the Bills to facilitate the Price adjustment to the petitioners own account as follows:

3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the claim of the Writ Petitioner has been admitted. The Respondents have also submitted that the Writ Petitioner has completed